For a long time, education sold itself on promises. Go to college. Buy the technology. Launch the program. The results would follow.

Today's reading suggests that's no longer enough. Students, families, policymakers, and school systems are all asking the same question: Does it work?

Start with the Bureau of Indian Education, where on-time graduation climbed from just over half in 2015 to a record 79% by 2025. Some of that reflects better data; for years, schools counted students who transferred as dropouts. But some of it reflects a genuine shift in priorities. At Chief Leschi Schools in Washington, superintendent Don Brummett says his staff stopped treating college as the only worthwhile destination and built out career training instead. "We devalued the trades. That was a mistake," he told the Associated Press. Graduation there rose from 53% to 87%. The gains are real, and so is the concern from tribal leaders that changes at the Education Department and BIE could stall them.

Districts are feeling a version of the same pressure when they buy technology. Education Week's Market Brief lays out the sector's next test: after a decade of filling classrooms with devices, states and districts are writing screen-time limits and asking vendors to justify every minute. At least six states passed screen-time laws this year, and Los Angeles Unified just capped daily use grade by grade. My colleague Hillary Rinaldi, who has tracked these debates across hundreds of districts, puts the new bar plainly: companies will have to show more than that a product works. They'll have to show the limited screen time is worth spending on it.

Higher education is facing the same demand. In the Hechinger Report, Tulane's Anita Raj argues that public universities in poor Southern states have to prove their value, with pathways to in-state jobs and research that reaches the community, or keep losing students and public confidence. That lands alongside two other pieces asking whether the traditional college path still delivers on its promise: the Chronicle of Higher Education examines why more young men are opting out of college, while The New York Times profiles Gen Z students choosing the trades over four-year degrees, betting that practical skills and faster returns offer a surer path in an uncertain economy.

The pattern runs through all of it: good intentions aren't enough anymore. Programs have to prove they work.

– Thomas

Looking for your next opportunity in education? W/A Jobs features 3,500+ career opportunities from 300+ organizations across the education industry.